For your perusal my first spring pole, a first year model 81, #638 in 35 remington. It is unmodified with a buckhorn rear sight and up front a Lyman #5 sight. My smith rates the bluing at ~90% and the furniture a little less.
I had wanted to have him mount a NIB Williams fp-81 sight on it as I find I shoot a peep far better than a buckhorn sight.
He convinced me not to molest it by drilling extra holes in it and keep it stock. It's going to be a safe queen for now.
I still might add either a Lyman or Marbles tang sight if I find one with mounting screw at a fair price.
In the meantime I have the very nice model 8 I purchased from Sarge756 arriving this week.
Model 81 #638
- Hardrada55
- Posts: 279
- Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2009 1:40 pm
- Location: Southwest Oklahoma
- Contact:
Re: Model 81 #638
That's very nice...
...the right of citizens to bear arms is just one more guarantee against arbitrary government, one more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote in America..."
- Hubert H. Humphrey, "Gun" magazine, Feb. '60
- Hubert H. Humphrey, "Gun" magazine, Feb. '60
Re: Model 81 #638
Hey Bullpupone,
It looks to me like you do not have serial number 638. Upon enlarging the serial number, I can see you have serial number “63 B”, which makes this a fairly rare model 81. There were not that many 81 B’s produced and to have a low serial number would make this a 1936 year of issue. It would be my suggestion to not do anything to alter your rifle.
Regards,
jack1653
It looks to me like you do not have serial number 638. Upon enlarging the serial number, I can see you have serial number “63 B”, which makes this a fairly rare model 81. There were not that many 81 B’s produced and to have a low serial number would make this a 1936 year of issue. It would be my suggestion to not do anything to alter your rifle.
Regards,
jack1653
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2021 9:41 pm
Re: Model 81 #638
Jack,
Alas, I was correct it is SN 638, wish I wasn't. Not rare but still it is a three digit Model 81 in very nice condition. So I will tuck it away for now.
BP-1
Alas, I was correct it is SN 638, wish I wasn't. Not rare but still it is a three digit Model 81 in very nice condition. So I will tuck it away for now.
BP-1
Re: Model 81 #638
Hey Bullpupone,
I don’t want to be argumentative, but the last picture you posted regarding my first reply is not the same as the first picture you posted. There are inconsistencies between the two pictures. Make a close examination of the “8” in the last picture to the straight line on the “ B” in the first picture. Also, I cannot see the numbers in the second picture that are on the trigger guard in the last picture. There is also a visible ring near the bottom of the receiver near the removable screw. Maybe a picture problem.
Regards,
jack1653
I don’t want to be argumentative, but the last picture you posted regarding my first reply is not the same as the first picture you posted. There are inconsistencies between the two pictures. Make a close examination of the “8” in the last picture to the straight line on the “ B” in the first picture. Also, I cannot see the numbers in the second picture that are on the trigger guard in the last picture. There is also a visible ring near the bottom of the receiver near the removable screw. Maybe a picture problem.
Regards,
jack1653
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2021 9:41 pm
Re: Model 81 #638
Jack,
I will post additional photos, what views would help for clarity? Also is there a trick to posting high resolution photos?
BP-1
I will post additional photos, what views would help for clarity? Also is there a trick to posting high resolution photos?
BP-1
Re: Model 81 #638
Hey Bullpupone,
I do not have any suggestions for high resolution pictures. It isn’t necessary to post additional pictures. My only reason for questioning the serial number was to alert you to the fact that if it were a 81-B, you had a very unique rifle.
Remington was not consistent on how they put the “B” on the receiver. I have six of the 81-B rifles and there are differences In 4 of the 6 rifles. Some had factory checkering and some did not. I have one that has the “B” in front of the serial number. The only one known to exist. There were even different locations on the receiver.
Some had hyphens between the serial numbers and the “B”. The other inconsistency was the size of the letter “B”. I am sure the value on the 81-B’s have increased. I just wanted to make you aware of what you may have and that making modifications would affect the value. The rifle appears to be in great condition and is a good addition to any collection.
Good luck with your collecting.
Regards,
jack1653
I do not have any suggestions for high resolution pictures. It isn’t necessary to post additional pictures. My only reason for questioning the serial number was to alert you to the fact that if it were a 81-B, you had a very unique rifle.
Remington was not consistent on how they put the “B” on the receiver. I have six of the 81-B rifles and there are differences In 4 of the 6 rifles. Some had factory checkering and some did not. I have one that has the “B” in front of the serial number. The only one known to exist. There were even different locations on the receiver.
Some had hyphens between the serial numbers and the “B”. The other inconsistency was the size of the letter “B”. I am sure the value on the 81-B’s have increased. I just wanted to make you aware of what you may have and that making modifications would affect the value. The rifle appears to be in great condition and is a good addition to any collection.
Good luck with your collecting.
Regards,
jack1653
Re: Model 81 #638
Hello Jack.jack1653 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 31, 2021 4:14 pm Hey Bullpupone,
I don’t want to be argumentative, but the last picture you posted regarding my first reply is not the same as the first picture you posted. There are inconsistencies between the two pictures. Make a close examination of the “8” in the last picture to the straight line on the “ B” in the first picture. Also, I cannot see the numbers in the second picture that are on the trigger guard in the last picture. There is also a visible ring near the bottom of the receiver near the removable screw. Maybe a picture problem.
Regards,
jack1653
If you look very closely “and under good lighting” at the left side of the receiver on 8’s & 81’s you’ll see that there is a total of 4 visible “ghost” rings present. It may not be visible on all examples due to condition of the finish.
Last edited by Hibby83 on Mon Nov 01, 2021 5:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2021 9:41 pm
Re: Model 81 #638
Jack
Photo of the left side, I only see 2 ghost rings. I think the "B" was the 8 after my compression app changed it to get this site to accept my photos.
BP-1
Photo of the left side, I only see 2 ghost rings. I think the "B" was the 8 after my compression app changed it to get this site to accept my photos.
BP-1