Sight holes question

Posts about the Model 81~Woodsmaster~
Post Reply
User avatar
Pitchy
Posts: 249
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 1:09 pm
Location: Mn.

Sight holes question

Post by Pitchy »

This 81 of mine has two holes in the tang, did someone tap it for a tang sight other than the type that goes in the forward hole.

Image
A lot of water under the bridge good and bad,
Bad when i did it my way, Good when i did it Gods way.

USAF-72-76
User avatar
Sarge756
Posts: 832
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 10:17 am
Location: N.Florida on the coast

Re: Sight holes question

Post by Sarge756 »

Looks like that was the reason for the two new holes.It wasn`t done at the factory. They appear to be straight and would give you another option for mounting a sight.Might be able to find something that would go for a little less than the sights made for the 8/81`s. If you decide to go that route just be sure the holes in the sight you find measured center to center are the same as the holes in the tang.
Joe
".......ain't many troubles that a man cain't fix
With seven hundred dollars and a thirty ought six."
User avatar
Pitchy
Posts: 249
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 1:09 pm
Location: Mn.

Re: Sight holes question

Post by Pitchy »

Yepper, that`s what i was figuring too, crazy thing is a couple months back i gave a Lyman peep that would of fit it perfect to a pard in WY. :roll:
Oh well that`s the way it goes. :)
A lot of water under the bridge good and bad,
Bad when i did it my way, Good when i did it Gods way.

USAF-72-76
User avatar
Wildgoose
Posts: 237
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 5:53 am
Location: Nebraska

Re: Sight holes question

Post by Wildgoose »

Sure looks like someone adapted a more recent flat base style tang sight to the gun. I can see how one might do that considering the cost of the vintage single hole units made for these rifles. Now that the deed has been done it gives you some options. Not really a bad deal at all. I have tang sights on all but the scoped 8/81's I have. They greatly imporove my shooting with these rifles.
Post Reply